Trump supporters still believe the president’s economic agenda will help them move up a notch on the social ladder. Mr. Trump promised his supporters he would keep the economy running like a fine-tuned machine, and he would build a $3 billion border wall. He also said he would build new roads and bridges and he would get the immigration issues under control. But Trump promises are still on his economic table, and most of them will stay there, thanks to the Democrats.
Hedge fund investors like Shervin Pishevar know Trump’s in over his head. Mr. Pishevar made that clear in his 2018 tweetstorm. Shervin Pishevar understands the relationship between a good economic agenda and an agenda that sounds good, but crashes and burns when it stretches the limits of economic principles. Trump’s tariffs on allies and a trade war with the second most powerful nation in the world didn’t make sense to Shervin Pishevar. So he spent 24 hours on Twitter shooting holes in Trump’s economic plan without mentioning his name.
Shervin Pishevar is a hedge fund investor who knows a good startup when he sees one. When he was an asset manager at Menlo Ventures, he thought Uber would be a moneymaker. Pishevar invested $21 million in Uber. That investment along with investments in Warby Parker, Airbnb, Dollar Shave Club, and Postmates put Shervin in elite investment company. When he left Menlo to start his own hedge fund, investors jumped at the chance to invest with him.
Investment company , Pishevar’s hedge fund, started off with a bang, but Shervin had to resign at the end of 2017. In March 2018, Pishevar decided to let other investors know Trump was bad for the investment industry. But most investors thought Shervin lost his ability to read economic trends. His tweets painted a grim investment picture while Mr. Trump claimed victory in his quest to level the global economic playing field.
Mr. Trump still claims he will give investors what they need in 2019. But Shervin Pishevar knows Trump doesn’t have a clue how to do that.
According to Shervin Pishevar, monopolies like Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook limit the growth of small startups. This adversely impacts innovation. It results in the centralization of new ideas. The whole economy suffers in this situation.
The monopolies described by Shervin Pishevar have been an enemy of capitalism since the advent of the global economy. Nevertheless, they grew strong enough to set the stage for central banks. Alone, these events are not the most desirable circumstances. However, combined with nearly absolute power the result is a stifling of the economy.
These organizations have even demonstrated an ability to circumvent first world governments. Shervin Pishevar compels one to consider, that with so much power at their disposal, how can small startups expect to compete, let alone turn a profit. Notice that the monopolies discussed here are all US companies. The US is home to small business. This illustrates the magnitude of the global domination that big businesses have over the world.
The technology sector becomes a bigger part of the global economy with each passing year. Innovation has shown to be critical to technological advancement. This sector does not stand still. One can only speculate what might happen if it did. It is a foregone conclusion that computers will become faster, homes smarter, and cars more automated. These occurrences are as secure as when oil was compared to gold. Technological innovation is so impactful that philanthropic organizations dedicate their efforts toward digital interconnectivity. This includes the most remote regions of the third world.
As important as technology is to the economy and innovation is to technology, ideas are the starting point. Without ideas, innovation might only be limited to speed. All the world could be still sitting in front of high-performance PC’s without smartphones if it were not for idea men like Steve Jobs. This is where Shervin Pishevar shines. Small business is the breeding grounds for ideas. Yes, large corporations have formidable research and development departments, but they have an underlying agenda. Corporations need to make administrative decisions that blind them to possibilities that small businesses find apparent.